Diagnosed with ovarian cancer after using Johnson’s Baby Power?
Contact us immediately as timing is of the essence! It costs nothing to review your case.
# Talcum Powder Lawsuit
J&J Allegedly Knew About the Cancer Risk But Did Nothing – And Has Been Hit With Talcum Powder Lawsuits, Billions in Verdicts.
$2.1 billion
In June 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court let the largest verdict in the litigation against baby powder stand.
-“J&J to Pay $2.1 Billion Talc Award as Top Court Nixes Appeal,” June 1, 2021. Bloomberg.
$100 million
In October 2020, Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay over $100 million to resolve more than 1,000 lawsuits which claimed the company’s Baby Powder caused the plaintiffs’ ovarian cancer.
– “J&J to Pay More Than $100 Million to End Over 1,000 Talc Suits,” Oct. 5, 2020. Bloomberg.
$4.69 billion
In July 2018, a jury awarded $4.69 billion to a group of 22 women who claimed Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder-containing products, such as Baby Powder, caused their ovarian cancer. In December 2018, the company lost its motion to reverse the verdict.
-“J&J Loses Bid to Overturn a $4.7 Billion Baby Powder Verdict,” Dec 19, 2018. The New York Times.
$70 million
In October 2016, an ovarian cancer patient was awarded $70 million after alleging that her cancer was caused by years of Baby Powder use. Johnson & Johnson has also stated that the company will appeal the decision.
-“Jury Awards More Than $70 Million to Woman in Baby Power Lawsuit,” Oct. 28, 2016. CNBC.
File a Talcum Powder Lawsuit = Send a Message
Tell Big Pharma It’s Not Okay to Play with Women’s Lives!
Johnson & Johnson’s History of Deception
- As early as 1957, J&J’s own documents reported finding minerals found in asbestos in their talc.
- By 1976, the FDA weighed limits on asbestos in cosmetic talc products. J&J assured the regulator that no asbestos was detected in any sample of talc produced between December 1972 and October 1973. This assurance was a lie.
- In the 1972-1975 time frame, at least three tests found asbestos in their talc, and they even reported in one case that levels were “rather high”. Reuters Special Report
- In the most recent development in the Talc cases, APRIL 2020, Judge Wolfson has ruled to allow Plaintiffs’ experts to testify that Talc contains asbestos despite Johnson & Johnson’s repeated denials. This testimony is crucial for Plaintiffs in this talcum powder litigation. -> In April 2020, Judge Wolfson ruled to allow Plaintiffs’ experts to testify that Talc contains asbestos despite Johnson & Johnson’s repeated denials. This testimony is crucial for Plaintiffs in this talcum powder litigation.
Learn More
Studies Link Talcum Powder Use to Increased Ovarian Cancer Risks
The number of studies that link talcum powder use to an increased risk of ovarian cancer in women is staggering.
A 2016 study in Epidemiology found that ovarian cancer was thirty-three percent higher for women who used talc for intimate personal hygiene (as in, sprinkling it in their panties or around their private areas to keep dry) on a regular basis than those who did not.
In another study published in June 2013 in the Cancer Prevention Research journal, women who used talcum powder for personal hygiene had a 20 percent increased risk of developing ovarian cancer.
A previous 2003 study published in Anticancer Research reported that use of talcum powder in intimate areas increased the risk of ovarian cancer by nearly 30 percent.
Contact us to learn how you can file a talcum powder lawsuit for ovarian cancer after talc-based baby powder use.
Contact Us
File a lawsuit = Send a Message
Tell Big Pharma It’s Not Okay to Play with Women’s Lives!
